Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism cube black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is way better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's overall score of 71.8. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is a lot newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's, but it is thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G takes better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a much higher resolution back camera.
Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.