Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a 76.9 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a way newer device than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, but it's a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Moto Z Play Droid and Samsung Galaxy A70 feature really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy A70 features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Moto Z Play Droid takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A70 has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.