Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, having a general score of 98.9 against 71.8. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a larger screen, a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a camera with a way higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.