Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is much better than Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 score. The Galaxy Note 3 is a better phone than Moto Z Play Droid, we must note that it's also a way older, thicker and a little heavier phone. The Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount per display inch, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics processor.
Galaxy Note 3's camera is just as good as the Moto Z Play Droid one, although the Galaxy Note 3 has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video and a lower video definition. The Moto Z Play Droid counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3510mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.