Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, getting an 89 score against 71.8. Galaxy Note10's design is newer than Moto Z Play Droid's, but it's a little thicker and a little bit heavier. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery lifetime is very similar to the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid one, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just 3500mAh battery size against 3510mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.