Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, getting a global score of 77.7 against 71.8. Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a much older, thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid. The Moto Z Play Droid features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Moto Z Play Droid also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid also has 4 more CPU cores (although slower). The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Play Droid counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Moto Z Play Droid captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z Play Droid also has a higher 16 megapixels resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.