Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's general score of 71.8. Although the Galaxy Note4 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, it must be told that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier cellphone. The Galaxy Note4 has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a greater screen pixel density and a little larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Play Droid features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4. They have 8 processing cores and 3 GB of RAM. Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution back camera.
Moto Z Play Droid has much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z Play Droid also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Play Droid features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.