Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a 79.5 score against 71.8. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, Samsung Galaxy Note7's body is a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Play Droid features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Play Droid has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores (but slower).
Galaxy Note7 counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although the Galaxy Note7 has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid also counts with a back camera with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.