Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a overall score of 89.7 against 71.8. Galaxy S10 Lite is a notably newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although it is thicker and heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a F2 aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has higher 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S10 Lite has improved battery life than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.