Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge and the Moto Z Play Droid were released with only 6 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's body is just a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than the Moto Z Play Droid.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Moto Z Play Droid features a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S7 edge features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 edge takes slightly better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.