Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, with a overall score of 81.7 against 71.8. The Galaxy S8 body is just a little thicker but just a little bit lighter than Moto Z Play Droid, and both were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy S8 counts with a better looking screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a higher screen pixel density.
The Motorola Moto Z Play Droid counts with more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S8 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto Z Play Droid has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S8 captures slightly better photos and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.