Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with an 80.6 score against 71.8. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, but it is somewhat heavier and notably thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite takes a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto Z Play Droid has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a very superior battery life than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.