Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is better than the Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is a lot newer than the Moto Z Play Droid's, although it's thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Moto Z Play Droid feature similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The Moto Z Play Droid features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.