Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid's score of 71.8. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Moto Z Play Droid have similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger aperture for better low light captures and video and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Moto Z Play Droid counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a way better battery performance than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.