Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is much better than the Moto Z Play, getting an 84.2 score against 74.4. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro's construction is way newer than Moto Z Play's, but it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has an older 14 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto Z Play has a very superior hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Moto Z Play, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.