Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is slightly better than Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. Even being the best in this comparison review, the LG V20 construction is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than Moto Z Play. Moto Z Play has a bit superior processing unit than LG V20, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores.
LG V20 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a little bit bigger display and a better count of pixels per screen inch. LG V20 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a 16 megapixels, the LG V20 also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V20 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Play, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V20 also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto Z Play features just a little better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 3510mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V20 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.