Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. Motorola DROID Turbo's body is older, just a little bit heavier and notably thicker than Moto Z Play. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Play, because although it has less cpu cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola DROID Turbo takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Moto Z Play features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.