Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than Moto Z Play, with an 84.7 score against 74.4. Even though Galaxy A32 is way newer than the Moto Z Play, it is extremely thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and Moto Z Play counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as Moto Z Play's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Moto Z Play counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy A32 has a much better battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a larger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.