Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is better than Moto Z Play's 74.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A60's construction is way newer, but a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Moto Z Play. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A60 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Moto Z Play counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Play counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a 16 MP resolution camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a larger camera aperture for better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.