Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than Moto Z Play, having a overall score of 84.9 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Play. Galaxy A80 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A80 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A80 counts with a display that is very similar to Moto Z Play's screen, because although the Galaxy A80 has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Moto Z Play has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a bit longer battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3510mAh. Galaxy A80 features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F2 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A80 also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.