Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, getting a 90.5 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, and Motorola Moto Z Play comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better processing power than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a greater camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with longer battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.