Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-10-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Play's 74.4 general score. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is just a little bit thinner but heavier than the Moto Z Play, and both were only released with a couple months difference.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a processor that is just as good as the Moto Z Play one, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z Play counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Moto Z Play also counts with a bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Moto Z Play has a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Moto Z Play also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Moto Z Play counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.