Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
VerizonSM-N910V
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Play, with an 81.6 score against 74.4. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. Despite being the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also a notably older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
The Galaxy Note 4 counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Note 4 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy Note 4 counts with a sharper display than Moto Z Play, because it has a little bit bigger display, a greater pixels count in each display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Moto Z Play counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z Play also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Play features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 4 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rates.
The Galaxy Note 4 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto Z Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.