Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | -- |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 FE is slightly better than the Moto Z Play, with a score of 76 against 74.4. Galaxy S24 FE is a notably heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Moto Z Play. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy S24 FE has the previous 14 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Moto Z Play counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Play counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Moto Z Play captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low light environments and a much worse 16 mega pixels resolution camera.
Although Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S24 FE, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Play, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.