Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than the Moto Z Play, having a overall score of 78.8 against 74.4. These phones have Android operating system, but vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the vivo X60 Pro is noticeably newer than the Moto Z Play, it is a little bit heavier and a little thicker.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376.
Vivo X60 Pro has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a back camera with lot more MP and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit more memory to install games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.