Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is way better than the Motorola Moto Z, having a 92.8 score against 74.5. The iPhone 12 Pro construction is way newer, but a lot heavier and a lot thicker than Motorola Moto Z. The iPhone 12 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola Moto Z comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a bit sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Moto Z counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a better performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a greater number of cores , a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a lesser MP camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 2815mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
IPhone 12 Pro is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.