Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z, getting an 81.6 score against 74.5. Although it's the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a extremely thicker and just a little heavier device. Moto Z has a slightly better looking display than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a way better display density, a bigger screen and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
IPhone 7 has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone 7 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto Z has better battery performance than iPhone 7, because it has 2600mAh of battery capacity. IPhone 7 has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, they both have the same aperture.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 7, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.