Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z's score of 74.5. The Apple iPhone X design is newer, but thicker and way heavier than the Motorola Moto Z. The iPhone X features a superior processor than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a greater number of faster cores.
Apple iPhone X features a little sharper display than Moto Z, because although it has a quite worse pixels count in each inch in the display and a little bit worse 1125 x 2436 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The iPhone X counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone X counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size. IPhone X features a slightly better camera than Moto Z, although it has a back camera with a worse resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto Z, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.