Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone has a score of 77.1, which is slightly better than Moto Z's 74.5 global score. The Asus ROG Phone is a incredibly newer phone than Moto Z, although it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. Asus ROG Phone features a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z one, because although the Asus ROG Phone has a little worse pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Asus ROG Phone has a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. Moto Z captures much better photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone, although it has worse video frame rate, they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture.
The Asus ROG Phone counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone has a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.