Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-03-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra is a bit better than Moto Z, with a 76.1 score against 74.5. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's body is noticeably newer than Moto Z's, but it's a lot thicker and extremely heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Moto Z counts with a much faster CPU than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and 8 GB less RAM memory. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a more vivid display than Moto Z, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way worse pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 112 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.