Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 general score. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z, it's extremely thicker and extremely heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL features a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z, and although they both have the same pixels density, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better performance than Moto Z, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. Google Pixel 4 XL takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Moto Z features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a really longer battery duration than Moto Z, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.