Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a general score of 82.2, which is much better than the Moto Z's global score of 74.5. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has older 14 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s construction is notably thinner and notably lighter than Moto Z.
The Moto Z has an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z counts with an incredibly better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot greater pixel number per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.