Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 has a global score of 76.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but LG Stylo 6 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. LG Stylo 6's construction is a lot newer, but a lot heavier and notably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z.
The Motorola Moto Z features a little more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel count in each inch in the screen. The LG Stylo 6 counts with more memory for apps and games than Moto Z, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Stylo 6 also has 32 GB more internal memory.
The LG Stylo 6 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has 4 more CPU cores. Motorola Moto Z takes a bit better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto Z also has a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG Stylo 6 has a much better battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 54% bigger battery capacity.
LG Stylo 6 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.