Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is a lot better than Moto Z, with a 91.2 score against 74.5. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but LG Wing has older 10 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. LG Wing's body is a lot newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than the Moto Z. The Motorola Moto Z has a slightly better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
LG Wing counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Moto Z, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage. LG Wing has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The LG Wing has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh. LG Wing counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the LG Wing also has a lot better resolution back camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.