Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting a 92.8 score against 74.5. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a a lot newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z, although it is notably heavier and a lot thicker. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the previous 12 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Moto Z counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a superior processor than Moto Z, because it has a higher number of cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto Z, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.