Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than the Moto Z, having a 79.8 score against 74.5. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is way newer than the Moto Z, it's incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier.
Motorola One Hyper features a little better performance than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has a greater number of cores. Moto Z has just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper costs more than the Moto Z, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.