Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 7.2 has a general score of 75.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. The Nokia 7.2 construction is much newer, but much thicker and incredibly heavier than Moto Z. These phones have Android operating system, but Nokia 7.2 has older 10 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Moto Z features a bit better display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Nokia 7.2 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Nokia 7.2 features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores. The Nokia 7.2 features better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. Nokia 7.2 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 7.2 also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.