Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A33 5G has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Moto Z's overall score of 74.5. The Galaxy A33 5G construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and noticeably thicker than Moto Z. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy A33 5G has 12 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Moto Z has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Moto Z counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Moto Z captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Galaxy A33 5G has a very superior battery duration than Moto Z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.