Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is much better than Motorola Moto Z, with an 82.9 score against 74.5. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A34 has 13 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy A34 body is noticeably lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto Z.
Samsung Galaxy A34 features a bit superior processor than Moto Z, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also has a greater number of cores. Moto Z features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Moto Z counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A34 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A34 also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 92% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.