Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z's 74.5 global score. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is newer than Motorola Moto Z, it's noticeably thicker and a lot heavier.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a higher number of 2.2 GHz cores and more RAM memory. Moto Z counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G takes way better pictures and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.