Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C7 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting a 77.7 score against 74.5. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy C7 is a somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z. These devices have the same Android 8.0 Oreo OS (operating system), so they should provide very similar OS features.
The Moto Z has a little sharper screen than Galaxy C7, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy C7 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy C7 also has a higher number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Moto Z has a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy C7 has improved battery life than Moto Z, because it has a 27% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.