Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is better than the Motorola Moto Z, getting an 87.7 score against 74.5. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Motorola Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Galaxy M51 is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z, it is way thicker and a lot heavier.
Moto Z has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy M51 counts with more memory for apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit better CPU than Moto Z, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of 2.2 GHz cores. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy M51 features a much better camera than Moto Z, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also has a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.