Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than the Moto Z, having a overall score of 82.7 against 74.5. These devices include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro body is extremely newer than Moto Z's, although it's noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Moto Z counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a camera in the back with way more MP and better 60 fps video frame rates. The Motorola Moto Z counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a way better battery performance than Moto Z, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.