Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 284.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is much better than the Moto Z's 74.5 global score. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro design is noticeably newer than Moto Z's, but it is way thicker and noticeably heavier. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has an older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Moto Z features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a little faster CPU than Moto Z, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a much longer battery life than Moto Z, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.