Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-10 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 83.7 score against 77.4. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it is incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a way larger diafragm aperture and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
LG V50 ThinQ has more storage to install games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.