Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 70.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-08-10 | 2018-10-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is much better than the Razer Phone 2, having a global score of 77.4 against 70.1. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is an older cellphone than the Razer Phone 2, but Motorola was able to build it thinner and notably lighter. Moto Z2 Force Edition and Razer Phone 2 both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Razer Phone 2 has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Razer Phone 2 features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Razer Phone 2 also has more RAM memory. The Razer Phone 2 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same video quality, the Razer Phone 2 also has a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments, better video frame rates and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features more storage for games and applications than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Razer Phone 2 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition costs a bit more money than the Razer Phone 2, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.