Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-08-10 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2730mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a 79.5 score against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S7's body is older, a bit heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S7 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy S7 also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S7 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
The Galaxy S7 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.