Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gray and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is slightly better than Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. The iPhone 8 is a lighter phone than Moto Z4, but both of them are equally thin. IPhone 8 has a more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 8 has just a bit better screen than Moto Z4, although it has a much smaller screen, a just a little lower pixel density and a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334. Motorola Moto Z4 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto Z4 features a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z4 has a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z4. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z4, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.