Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a general score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 overall score. The Google Nexus 6P construction has the same thickness than Motorola Moto Z4, but it is a little heavier. Moto Z4 and Google Nexus 6P both have quite similar processors, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto Z4 shoots much better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z4 also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Moto Z4 features a much better storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z4 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a little better battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z4, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.