Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is just a bit better than LG V20, with a 79.8 score against 77. Moto Z4 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG V20. The Moto Z4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto Z4 also has a larger number of cores.
LG V20 has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto Z4 features a better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z4 also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos.
The LG V20 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z4, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z4 has a little longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola Moto Z4, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V20, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.